Rappaport v. Federal Savings Bank et al
Jason E Rappaport |
Federal Savings Bank and Stephen M Calk |
2:2018cv01404 |
May 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
G Murray Snow |
Other Personal Injury |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the writ of garnishment issued as to TFSB (Doc. 68 ) is vacated [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 12/7/21. (MAW) |
Filing 65 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the motion to confirm arbitration and enter judgment thereon (Doc. 60 ) is granted. A separate judgment shall issue. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that after the separate judgment issues, the Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. The Court retains jurisdiction to resolve a timely motion for attorneys' fees, should Rappaport choose to file one. (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 8/26/21. (SST) |
Filing 52 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion to stay (Doc. 49 ) is denied without prejudice. (See attached Order for additional details). Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 10/11/19. (JAMA) Modified on 10/11/2019 - added WO (JAMA). |
Filing 37 ORDER granting 12 Motion to Stay and 33 Motion to Strike. The Parties shall file a Joint Status Report regarding the status of the arbitration on 10/29/2018 and every 90 days thereafter until the stay is lifted. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/31/18. (DXD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.