Geiger et al v. Creative Impact Incorporated et al
| Rosa Acosta, Jessica Burciaga, Jessa Hinton, Brenda Geiger, Jessica Killings and CJ Gibson |
| Unknown Parties, Creative Impact Incorporated and Creative Impact Incorporated an Arizona Corporation doing business as Bandaids Show Club |
| 2:2018cv01443 |
| May 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| James A Teilborg |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15486334. This case has been assigned to the Honorable James A Teilborg. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 18-01443-PHX-JAT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SIB) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Creative Impact Incorporated. (Dow, David) (SIB) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa Superior Court, case number CV2018-052189. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15486334 filed by Creative Impact Incorporated. (Dow, David) (Attachments: #1 State Court documents, #2 State Court docket, #3 State Court Notice, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Supplemental Cover Sheet)(SIB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
