Danam v. Arizona Board of Education
| Rafael Cezar Danam |
| Arizona Board of Education |
| 2:2018cv01493 |
| May 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER - 1. Plaintiff's first amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to serve under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 2. Plaintiff's pending motions (Docs. 42 , 43 ) are denied as moot. 3. The Clerk is directed to terminate this case. 4. Plaintiff shall make no further filings in this case. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 6/19/19. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 MOTION to Dismiss. Dismissal for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) will be granted, with leave to amend, if Defendants are properly served. Plaintiff's pending Motions (Docs. 31 , 32 , 33 ) are denied as moot. By 7/16/2019, Plaintiff must show good cause why the Court should grant an extension to serve all 18 Defendants under Rule 4, and provide proof that he is in fact a reserve member of the U.S. Armed Forces and has been deployed during the times averred to the Court. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 5/30/19. (DXD)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 13 ) is denied. 2. Plaintiff's motion to amend (Doc. 14 ) is denied as moot. The clerk is directed to file the lodged amended complaint (Doc. 15 ). 3. Plaintiff' s motion to adjust the case schedule (Doc. 17 ) is granted. 4. This action is stayed until April 10, 2019 pursuant to § 3932(b) of the SCRA. The stay will automatically expire on that date unless Plaintiff continues active duty service after M arch 30, 2019, and files an application for an additional stay pursuant to § 3932(d) of the SCRA. 5. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 19 ) is denied. Defendants' shall have fourteen (14) days after the stay expires to file a new motion to dismiss consistent with Local Rule 12.1 or otherwise respond to the amended complaint. (See document for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 1/11/19. (SLQ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Danam v. Arizona Board of Education | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rafael Cezar Danam | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Arizona Board of Education | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
