Swift v. Wesco Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Dale Swift
Defendant: Wesco Insurance Company, AmTrust North America Incorporated and Sebastian Lara
Case Number: 2:2018cv01531
Filed: May 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Yuma
Presiding Judge: John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDERED that the pending Motions in Limine are resolved as follows: Plaintiff's Motion in Limine re: Res Judicata of ICA Findings (Doc. 70 ) is granted as to both the March 28, 2018 and August 21, 2020 awards and findings. Defendants' Moti on in Limine re: Claims-Close Ratios (Doc. 72 ) is denied. Defendants' Motion in Limine re: Per Diem Damage Calculations (Doc. 73 ) is denied. Defendants' Motion in Limine re: Chiropractor Cradic (Doc. 74 ) is granted in part and denied in part. The Motion is granted as to Dr. Cradic's statements regarding Defendants' handling or payment of income benefits to Plaintiff. The Motion is otherwise denied. Defendants' Motion in Limine re: Employee Discipline Records (Doc. 75 ) is granted in part and denied in part as follows: The September 28, 2018 record is admissible only to show ownership, control, or the feasibility of precautionary measures. It is inadmissible to show Defendants culpable conduct. The November 2, 2017 record is admissible with respect to matters occurring before that date only to show ownership, control, or the feasibility of precautionary measures. The November 2, 2017 record is admissible in full with respect to matters occurring after that date. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 2/23/2021. (See Order for complete details) (ARC)
July 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART Defendants' 46 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Motion is granted as to Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages and denied as to Plaintiffs bad faith claim. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 7/10/20. (BAC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Swift v. Wesco Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dale Swift
Represented By: Patrick Mason Dennis
Represented By: Michael Patrick Doyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wesco Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AmTrust North America Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sebastian Lara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?