Udd v. Phoenix, City of et al
| Darren Udd and Amy Udd |
| Phoenix, City of and Mary Roberts |
| 2:2018cv01616 |
| May 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| G Murray Snow |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
173
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the City's motion to preclude Plaintiffs' expert from offering a particular opinion at trial (Doc. 168 ) is granted [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 5/5/21. (MAW)
|
|
Filing
167
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The City's first motion in limine (Doc. 137 ) is granted. Darren's state-law constructive discharge claim is dismissed. (2) The City's second motion in limine (Doc. 138 ) is denied. (3) The City's third motion in limine (Doc. 139 ) is denied. (4) The City's fourth motion in limine (Doc. 140 ) is denied. (5) The City's fifth motion in limine (Doc. 141 ) is denied without prejudice. (6) Plaintiffs' motion in limine (Doc. 142 ) is granted in part and denied in part. (7) The City may, by March 5, 2021, file a renewed motion to exclude Dr. Wilsons opinion concerning "medical necessity." [see attached Order for details] Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 2/12/21. (MAW)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Udds' motion to supplement the summary judgment record and their MIDP disclosures (Doc. 120 ) is granted in part and denied in part [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 4/17/20. (MAW)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' motion for summary judgment on all remaining claims (Doc. 98 ) is granted in part and denied in part. (2) Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 100 ) is granted in part and denied in part. (3) Plaintiffs' motion to exclude Defendants' expert witness (Doc. 99 ) is granted in part and denied in part. (4) Plaintiffs' motion to strike (Doc. 111 ) is denied [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 3/30/20. (MAW)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The partial motion to dismiss (Doc. 11 ) is GRANTED; 2. All of Amy's state-law claims against Roberts (Counts 2, 3, 7, and 9) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 3. Amy's claims against the City of Phoenix for abuse of process and IIED (Counts 2 and 3) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 4. The subset of Darren's state-law claims against Roberts that weren't identified in Darren's August 14, 2017 notice to Roberts, and which Darren attemp ted to articulate for the first time in his April 2, 2018 notice to Roberts, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 5. Darren's claims against the City of Phoenix and Roberts for abuse of process and IIED (Counts 2 and 3) are, to the extent not already dismissed with prejudice in the preceding paragraph, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 12/21/18. (MAW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
