Sampson v. Rozenman et al
Jana Sampson and Jana Rozenman |
Unknown Blanco, KV-9 Incorporated, Unknown Rozenman, Schutt Law Firm PLC, Dimitri Rozenman, Unknown Parties, Arkady Vikentiev, Jose Blanco and Unknown Vikentiev |
2:2018cv01707 |
June 4, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Steven P Logan |
Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15573342. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 18-1707-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SIB) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa Superior Court, case number FC2008-001839. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15573342 filed by Arkady Vikentiev, Jose Blanco, KV-9 Incorporated, Schutt Law Firm PLC. (Schutt, Kenneth) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B1, #3 Exhibit B2, #4 Exhibit B4, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(SIB) |
***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED: Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration and Amended Complaint upon Dimitri Rozenman on 2/22/2018. (SIB) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.