Valenzuela v. Regency Theater et al
Plaintiff: Jorge Benito Valenzuela
Defendant: Ainslie Company, Unknown Parties and Regency Theater
Case Number: 2:2018cv02013
Filed: June 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Yuma
Presiding Judge: David G Campbell
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2018 Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen G Montoya on behalf of Jorge Benito Valenzuela. (Montoya, Stephen)
August 8, 2018 Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #14 Rule 26(f) Report re MIDP filed by Jorge Benito Valenzuela. Incorrect PDF attached. Incorrect PDF attached. Discovery responses were attached. Pursuant to Notice to Parties - Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot Project, "A notice must be filed with the Court when filing MIDP responses and supplements but there is no requirement to file the documents themselves, unless there is an unresolved dispute regarding the responses and supplements that the Court must resolve during the Rule 16(b)(1) conference." It is noted that the Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) was filed at Doc. #15 . No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (LAD)
August 8, 2018 Filing 15 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) filed by Defendant Ainslie Company. (Frame, Paul)
August 8, 2018 Filing 14 * Response to Mandatory Initial Discovery Requests filed by Plaintiff Jorge Benito Valenzuela. (Camarena, Cornelius) * Modified incorrect PDF document attached and discovery materials filed on 8/9/2018 (LAD).
August 2, 2018 Filing 13 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant Ainslie Company. (Frame, Paul)
July 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Reset Scheduling Conference. The Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for 9/6/2018 at 3:30 PM is VACATED and RESET for 8/28/2018 at 04:30 PM in Courtroom 603, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge David G Campbell. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/12/2018. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DGC, nvo)
July 11, 2018 Filing 11 MOTION to Continue Rule 16 Case Management Conference by Ainslie Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Frame, Paul)
July 5, 2018 Filing 10 *NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #8 Notice (Other) filed by Ainslie Company, #7 Demand for Jury Trial by Defendant filed by Ainslie Company, #6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Ainslie Company . Documents not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MSA) *Modified on 7/5/2018 to add pleading (MSA).
July 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER re Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for 9/6/2018 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 603, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge David G Campbell. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/3/2018. (DGC, nvo)
July 3, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE re: Certificate Regarding Expert Testimony by Ainslie Company . (Frame, Paul)
July 3, 2018 Filing 7 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Ainslie Company. (Frame, Paul)
July 3, 2018 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Ainslie Company.(Frame, Paul)
June 27, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Ainslie Company. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAC)
June 27, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC)
June 27, 2018 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15661287. This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G Campbell. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-02013-PHX-DGC. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAC)
June 26, 2018 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ainslie Company. (Frame, Paul) (BAC)
June 26, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Yuma County Superior Court, case number S1400CV201800468. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-15661287 filed by Ainslie Company. (Frame, Paul) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet JS-44, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Supplemental, #3 Exhibit State Action Complaint)(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Valenzuela v. Regency Theater et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ainslie Company
Represented By: Paul Keith Frame
Represented By: Kristy Marie Frame
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Regency Theater
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jorge Benito Valenzuela
Represented By: Cornelius Candy Camarena
Represented By: Stephen G Montoya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?