Kenneth Eisen and Associates LTD v. Coxcom Incorporated et al
Defendant: Unknown Parties, Coxcom Incorporated, Coxcom Incorporated a Delaware corporation doing business as Cox Communications also known as CoxCom LLC and CoxCom LLC
Petitioner: Kenneth Eisen and Associates LTD and Kenneth Eisen and Associates Limited
Case Number: 2:2018cv02120
Filed: July 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Michelle H Burns
Referring Judge: John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Coxcom Incorporated. (SIB)
July 5, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (SIB)
July 5, 2018 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15692734. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michelle H Burns. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 18-2120-PHX-MHB. Magistrate Election form attached. PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (SIB)
July 5, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2018-007911. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15692734 filed by Coxcom Incorporated. (Cabianca, Brian) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Affidavit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(SIB)
July 5, 2018 ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED : Acceptance of Service re: Summons upon Coxcom Incorporated on 6/5/2018. (SIB) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kenneth Eisen and Associates LTD v. Coxcom Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenneth Eisen and Associates LTD
Represented By: Robert Patrick Rutila
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenneth Eisen and Associates Limited
Represented By: Robert Patrick Rutila
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coxcom Incorporated
Represented By: Keshia Williams Lipscomb
Represented By: Brian Andrew Cabianca
Represented By: Petrina A McDaniel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coxcom Incorporated a Delaware corporation doing business as Cox Communications also known as CoxCom LLC
Represented By: Keshia Williams Lipscomb
Represented By: Brian Andrew Cabianca
Represented By: Petrina A McDaniel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CoxCom LLC
Represented By: Keshia Williams Lipscomb
Represented By: Brian Andrew Cabianca
Represented By: Petrina A McDaniel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?