Bandala v. Suchilango LLC
Luis Vidal Bandala |
Suchilango LLC |
2:2018cv02140 |
July 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Eileen S Willett |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Complaint, 6 Notice of Deficiency (Text Only) Civil Cover Sheet by Plaintiff Luis Vidal Bandala. (Flood, Preston) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Luis Vidal Bandala. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile corrected document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAR) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAR) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Suchilango LLC. (BAR). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15698692. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Eileen S Willett. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-02140-PHX-ESW. Magistrate Election form attached. (BAR) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Luis Vidal Bandala.(Flood, Preston) (BAR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15698692 filed by Luis Vidal Bandala. (Flood, Preston) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bandala v. Suchilango LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Luis Vidal Bandala | |
Represented By: | Sean Christopher Davis |
Represented By: | Trey A R Dayes, III |
Represented By: | Preston K Flood |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Suchilango LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.