McDonald v. Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Insurance Company
| Robert McDonald |
| Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Insurance Company |
| 2:2018cv02249 |
| July 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Steven P Logan |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Robert McDonald. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Wilborn, John) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re: #9 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Insurance Company. (Graif, Jay) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Insurance Company. (Graif, Jay) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Robert McDonald. (Wilborn, John) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Robert McDonald. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wilborn, John) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Insurance Company.(Graif, Jay) |
| Filing 7 *NOTICE of Service re: #6 Preliminary Order filed by Robert McDonald. (Wilborn, John) *Modified to correct event and add document link on 7/23/2018 (REK). |
Filing 6
PRELIMINARY ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 7/18/18. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(CLB)
|
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Insurance Company identifying Other Affiliate National Indemnity Company for Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Insurance Company. (Graif, Jay) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Insurance Company. (SIB) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (SIB) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15735439. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 18-2249-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SIB) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2018-004889. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15735439 filed by Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Insurance Company. (Graif, Jay) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(SIB) |
| ***STATE RECORDS RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED: Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, Certificate of Arbitration and Request for Trial by Jury upon Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Insurance Company on 6/18/2018. (SIB) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McDonald v. Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert McDonald | |
| Represented By: | John Neal Wilborn |
| Represented By: | Charles J Surrano, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Jay Richard Graif |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
