Mendoza-Garcia v. Sessions et al
| Debora Griselda Mendoza-Garcia |
| Kirstjen M Nielsen, Enrique Lucero, Jeff B Sessions, James McHenry and Linda I Spencer-Walters |
| 2:2018cv02260 |
| July 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| Diane J Humetewa |
| Prisoner: Alien Detainee - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Debora Griselda Mendoza-Garcia. (Richter, Ahren) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Enrique Lucero, Kirstjen M Nielsen, Jeff B Sessions. (Branch, Katherine) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) by Enrique Lucero, Kirstjen M Nielsen, Jeff B Sessions.(Branch, Katherine) |
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED: Certified Mail Receipt re: 2241 Petition, Summons, Order, Motion for Preliminary Injunction/ Motion for TRO upon Jeff B Sessions on 8/6/18. (EJA) |
| Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED : Certified Mail Receipt re: 2241 Petition, Summons, Order, Motion for Preliminary Injunction/ Motion for TRO upon U.S. Attorney, District of Arizona on 8/6/18. (EJA) |
| Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED: Certified Mail Receipt re: 2241 Petition, Summons, Order, Motion for Preliminary Injunction/ Motion for TRO upon Enrique Lucero on Unknown Date. (REK) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Respondents Executive Office for Immigration Review Director McHenry and United States Immigration Judge Spencer-Walters are dismissed from this case; Petitioner's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and/or Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. #2 ) is denied in part as to Petitioner's request for a Temporary Restraining Order. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Summons, the Petition (Doc. #1 ), the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and/or Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. #2 ), and this Order upon the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona by certified mail addressed to the civil process clerk at the office of the United States Attorney. The Clerkof Court must also send by certified mail a copy of the Summons, the Petition, the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and/or Temporary Restraining Order, and this Order to the United States Attorney General. Respondents shall have 20 days from service of the Petition and Motion to file a Response to Petitioner's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 8/2/18. (EJA)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (KEP) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Debora Griselda Mendoza-Garcia. (Richter, Ahren) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(KEP) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Debora Griselda Mendoza-Garcia. (Richter, Ahren) (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(KEP) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241). Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 0970-15738927 filed by Debora Griselda Mendoza-Garcia. (Richter, Ahren) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit List, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H)(KEP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
