Martinez v. Sessions et al
| Samuel Petrie Martinez |
| Kirstjen M Nielsen, Enrique Lucero, James McHenry, Kris Kline and Jefferson B Sessions, III |
| 2:2018cv02261 |
| July 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| John Z Boyle |
| James A Teilborg |
| Prisoner: Alien Detainee - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SERVICE EXECUTED: Certified Mail Receipt re: Summons, Order, and 2241 Petition upon Attorney General of the United States on 8/27/2018. (REK) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) and Suggestion of Mootness by Kris Kline, Enrique Lucero, Kirstjen M Nielsen, Jefferson B Sessions, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-E)(Morrison, Kristina) |
| Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED: Certified Mail Receipt re: Summons, Order, and 2241 Petition upon U.S. Attorney, District of Arizona on 8/15/2018. (REK) |
| Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED: Certificate of Service re: Summons/Petition/Order upon Kris Kline on 8/13/18. (DXD) |
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED: Certified Mail Receipt re: Summons/Petition/Order upon Enrique Lucero on 8/13/18. (DXD) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General Jefferson B Sessions III, Kirstjen M Nielsen, Enrique Lucero, Kris Kline. (DXD) |
Filing 6
ORDER - Respondent McHenry is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk shall serve a copy of the Summons, the Petition (Doc. #1 ), and this Order upon the First Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Arizona, United States Attorney General, and to Respondents Sessions, Nielsen, Lucero, and Kline by certified mail. Respondents Sessions, Nielsen, Lucero, and Kline must answer the Petition within 20 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a Reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 8/9/18. (DXD)
|
| Filing 5 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) by Petitioner Samuel Petrie Martinez. (Rocha, Juan) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by Samuel Petrie Martinez. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MFR) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241) filed by Samuel Petrie Martinez. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile corrected document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MFR) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (MFR) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Fed/2241). Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 0970-15739049 filed by Samuel Petrie Martinez. (Rocha, Juan) (MFR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
