Lane #70772 v. Ryan
Plaintiff: Lyndle Jay Lane
Defendant: Charles L Ryan
Case Number: 2:2018cv02270
Filed: July 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: John Z Boyle (PS)
Referring Judge: Susan R Bolton
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2018 Filing 8 *Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Lyndle Jay Lane. Reason for return: no longer in custody. Document number #7 . (EJA) *Modified to correct event type on 9/5/2018 (EJA).
August 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Plaintiff's second Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #6 is denied without prejudice. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 8/09/2018. (REK)
August 7, 2018 Filing 6 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Lyndle Jay Lane. NOTE: Plaintiff only submitted 2nd page of IFP. (1 page) (EJA)
July 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 is denied without prejudice. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement. If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 7/31/2018. (REK)
July 17, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (EJA)
July 17, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (EJA)
July 17, 2018 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Lyndle Jay Lane. (2 pages) (EJA)
July 17, 2018 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Lyndle Jay Lane. (7 pages) (EJA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lane #70772 v. Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lyndle Jay Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles L Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?