Bravo v. Ryan et al
Petitioner: Rene De La Cruz Bravo
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Case Number: 2:2018cv02566
Filed: August 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Mohave
Presiding Judge: Deborah M Fine (PS)
Referring Judge: Roslyn O Silver
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2018 Filing 7 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number PHX201254. (REK)
September 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying #2 Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must pay the $5.00 filing fee. The Clerk shall enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot if Petitioner fails to comply. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 9/11/18. (DXD)
August 27, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE re: Certifying that Petitioners signature on the Certificate will serve as an original signature by Rene De La Cruz Bravo re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). (2 pages) (GMP)
August 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must file a completed and signed Certificate, using the Certificate form provided with this Order,certifying t hat Petitioner's signature on the Certificate will serve as an original signature, under penalty of perjury, on his 2254 Petition for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 2242, Rule 2(c)(5) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Rule 3.5(a) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, and Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If Petitioner fails to file a completed and signed Certificate on the form provided with this Order within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, strike Petitioner's 2254 Petition and enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 8/16/2018. (REK)
August 13, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (GMP)
August 13, 2018 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Rene De La Cruz Bravo. (2 pages) (GMP)
August 13, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Rene De La Cruz Bravo. (11 pages + envelope) (Attachments: #1 envelope)(GMP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bravo v. Ryan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Charles L Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rene De La Cruz Bravo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?