Lamb v. Ryan et al
| David Lee Lamb |
| Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan |
| 2:2018cv02569 |
| August 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number PHX200642. PAID IN FULL (DXD) |
| Filing 6 EXHIBITS 2-3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement re: #5 Response by David Lee Lamb (2 pages). (DXD) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE re: #3 Order by Petitioner David Lee Lamb (2 pages). (DXD) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Disclosure of Record by David Lee Lamb. (LAD) (11 pages) |
Filing 3
ORDER - Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk shall enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot if Petitioner fails to comply. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 8/21/18. (DXD)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (DXD) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by David Lee Lamb (27 pages). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
