Davis v. Goodyear Police Department et al
| John Leo Davis |
| Noah Yeo, Goodyear Police Department, Lori Ohrt, James Dougal and Jerry Geier |
| 2:2018cv02603 |
| August 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Bridget S Bade (PS) |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Amend/Correct #2 Lodged Proposed Complaint, MOTION to Withdraw #1 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Complaint by John Leo Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Proposed Amended Complaint)) (LAD) (25 pages) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (LAD) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by John Leo Davis. (LAD) (5 pages) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by John Leo Davis. (LAD) (3 pages) |
| Filing 2 LODGED Proposed Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint re: #1 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Complaint. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation for Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by John Leo Davis. (LAD) (29 pages) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Extend the Additional Page Limit in Plaintiff's Original Complaint by John Leo Davis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (LAD) (4 pages) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
