Mansfield v. Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau Incorporated
| Richard Mansfield |
| Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau Incorporated and Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau Incorporated doing business as American Medical Collection Agency |
| 2:2018cv02663 |
| August 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER that this matter will, without further Order of this Court, be dismissed within 60 days of the date of this order unless a stipulation to dismiss is filed prior to the dismissal date. FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to terminate this matter on 12/19/2018 without further leave of Court. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 10/17/2018. (MMO)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement by Richard Mansfield. (Thompson, Russell) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE re: Service by Richard Mansfield re: #7 Order re Rule 12(b) Motions . (Thompson, Russell) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 8/22/2018. (MMO)
|
| Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Richard Mansfield: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 08/23/2018 to Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. . (Thompson, Russell) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAR) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau Incorporated. (BAR). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15873214. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L. Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 18-02663-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAR) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Richard Mansfield. (Thompson, Russell) (BAR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15873214 filed by Richard Mansfield. (Thompson, Russell) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(BAR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
