Andrich v. Navient Solutions Incorporated et al
| Devin Andrich |
| Sara Evans, Unknown Parties, Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, Performant Recovery Services Incorporated and Navient Solutions Incorporated |
| 2:2018cv02766 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #10 a one-time extension of time until 11/2/18 for Defendant Navient Solutions, Inc. to respond to complaint. The parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's answer to the complaint after the extension. The parties should be aware that the filing of a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) will not postpone the time for compliance with the MIDP. General Order 17-08 provides that compliance may be deferred only for motions to dismiss based on lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, sovereign immunity, or absolute or qualified immunity of a public official. No further extensions will be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike #12 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 10/23/18. (CLB)
|
| Filing 12 *MOTION to Strike #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to #1 Complaint by Devin Andrich. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D)(Andrich, Devin) *Modified to add document link on 10/16/2018 (REK). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint filed by Navient Solutions Incorporated. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(c) - Documents shall be converted to PDF directly from a word processing program and per Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual must be text searchable. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
| Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint by Navient Solutions Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Noren, Benjamin) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Benjamin Samuel Noren on behalf of Navient Solutions Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Dennis N Lueck Jr on behalf of Navient Solutions Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 9/10/2018. (MMO)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiffshall be responsible for service of the summons and complaint. FURTHER ORDERED granting #4 Motion to Allow Electronic Filing. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 9/10/2018. (MMO)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (SLQ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (SLQ) |
| Filing 5 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-02766-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SLQ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Devin Andrich. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SLQ) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Devin Andrich. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (SLQ) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Devin Andrich. (SLQ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Devin Andrich. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SLQ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
