Robles v. Tolleson, City of
Plaintiff: Mark Anthony Robles, Jr.
Defendant: Tolleson, City of
Case Number: 2:2018cv02795
Filed: September 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Diane J Humetewa
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting the #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The Court has determined that good cause exists to defer the filing of an answer, counterclaim, crossclaim or reply while it considers the pending motion to dismiss. If the motion is denied, the Court will designate a time for filing answers, counterclaims, crossclaims, and replies. If no time is designated, Rule 12(a)(4) will apply. The obligation to file Mandatory Initial Discovery (MID) responses as set forth in General Order 17-08 shall be measured from that date. ORDERED by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 10/30/2018. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (LFIG)
October 8, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant Tolleson, City of. (Arnson, Aaron)
September 18, 2018 Filing 11 NOTICE re: Plaintiff's Non-Opposition Within Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss by Tolleson, City of re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION for More Definite Statement . (Arnson, Aaron)
September 11, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE re: Certification by Tolleson, City of re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION for More Definite Statement . (Arnson, Aaron)
September 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. ORDERED that Defendant is directed to comply with the aforementioned certification necessary to proceed with the Motion to Dismiss by filing a Notice of Certification on or before September 20, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing any party appearing pro se to become familiar with the Local Rules and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 9/11/2018. (LFIG)
September 11, 2018 Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Tolleson, City of. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Arnson, Aaron)
September 11, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Errata re: #4 Notice (Other) by Defendant Tolleson, City of.. (Arnson, Aaron)
September 6, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or in the Alternative, MOTION for More Definite Statement by Tolleson, City of. (LAD) (Pursuant to #4 , re-docketed for administrative purposes).
September 6, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE re: Service of Court Documents on Non-ECF Registered Party by Tolleson, City of re: #3 Notice re Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP), #2 New Case Opened . (Arnson, Aaron)
September 6, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE re: Pending Motion by Tolleson, City of re: #1 Notice of Removal . (Arnson, Aaron)
September 5, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (SIB)
September 5, 2018 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15921962. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Diane J Humetewa. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 18-2795-PHX-DJH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SIB)
September 5, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2018-010220. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15921962 filed by Tolleson, City of. (Arnson, Aaron) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Cover Sheet)(SIB)
September 5, 2018 ***STATE RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED re: Civil Complaint, Plaintiff's Demand for Jury Trial and Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon City of Tolleson on 7/27/2018. (SIB) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robles v. Tolleson, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tolleson, City of
Represented By: Aaron Dean Arnson
Represented By: Stephen Barry Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Anthony Robles, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?