Curtis v. Marquez et al
| Adam Josiah Curtis |
| Angela Marquez, Fraternal Order of Police and Phoenix Police Department |
| 2:2018cv02846 |
| September 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| James A Teilborg |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Disqualify Judge by Adam Josiah Curtis. (REK) |
Filing 10
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the motion for extension of time (Doc. #8 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff has until November 26, 2018 to file an amended complaint or this case will be dismissed [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 10/23/18. (MAW)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Adam Josiah Curtis re: #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #1 Complaint. (REK) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #1 Complaint by Adam Josiah Curtis. (REK) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed, without prejudice. Plaintiff has 30 days to file an amended complaint. If no amended complaint is filed in 30 days, the Clerk of the Court shall dismiss this case, with prejudice, and enter judgment accordingly [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/19/18. (MAW)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDARD CIVIL TRACK INITIAL ORDER: IT IS ORDERED, if not already accomplished prior to the date of this Order, that Plaintiff(s) shall effect service of the Complaint and Summons upon all Defendants no later than 90 days after the filing of the Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must comply with Gen. Ord. No. 17-08 (D. Ariz. Apr. 14, 2017) regarding the mandatory initial discovery responses. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve Defendant(s) with a copy of this Order [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/12/18. (MAW)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAS) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge James A Teilborg. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-02846-PHX-JAT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAS) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Adam Josiah Curtis. (BAS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Adam Josiah Curtis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
