Powers v. Child Protective Services et al
| Rebecca Powers |
| Richard Rolengord, Tolleson Police Department, Crystal Thompson, Child Protective Services and Amy Kromen |
| 2:2018cv02852 |
| September 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Diane J Humetewa |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Rebecca Powers. Reason for return: Insufficient Address - Unable to Forward. Document numbers #3 , #4 , and #5 . NOTE: Documents were re-mailed on 11/1/18 to corrected address. (ATD) |
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Rebecca Powers. Reason for return: unable to forward. Document numbers #3 , #4 , #5 . (SLQ) |
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Rebecca Powers. Reason for return: unclaimed, unable to forward. Document number #6 . (SLQ) |
Filing 6
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. #2 ) is granted; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed with leave to file a First Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date this Order is entered; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff does not file a First Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date this Order is entered, the Clerk of Court shall dismiss this action without further order of this Court; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff elects to file a First Amended Complaint, it may not be served until and unless the Court issues an Order screening the amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 9/13/18. (SLQ)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAS) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge Diane J Humetewa. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-02852-PHX-DJH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAS) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Rebecca Powers. (BAS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rebecca Powers.(BAS) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/25/2018: #1 missing page of comp) (BAS). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
