Moxe Health Corporation v. Health Moxy LLC
Moxe Health Corporation |
Health Moxy LLC |
2:2018cv02870 |
September 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
John J Tuchi |
Property Rights: Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #10 , Civil Case Terminated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (JAMA) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Moxe Health Corporation. (Jozefczyk, Dana) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Dana P Jozefczyk on behalf of plaintiff. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information filed by Moxe Health Corporation. (Clifford, John) |
Filing 8 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on December 13, 2018. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 9/14/18. (JAMA) |
Filing 7 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 9/14/18. (JAMA) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Moxe Health Corporation. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAR) |
Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER: Request for Copyright, Trademark, or Patent Information. This case has been designated as a copyright, trademark, or patent case. The Clerk's Office is required to provide information to the Patent and Trademark Office and/or Copyright Office regarding this case. Attached to this docket entry are the required form(s) that must be completed. Plaintiff shall complete the form that is applicable to this particular case. In some cases, you may need to complete both forms.Within seven (7) days, Plaintiff must submit the required form(s) to the Clerk's Office. Please complete the form and file it with the Court using the specific event: Notice of Filing - Copyright, Trademark or Patent Information, found under the Other Filings header. Please DO NOT mail the form directly to the Patent or Copyright Office. The Clerk's Office will submit the form. If neither form is required for this case, please file a notice indicating the reason the form is not necessary and use the event listed above. This form must be updated if additional patents, copyrights, or trademarks are alleged in a responsive pleading (Attachments: #1 AO 121)(BAR) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAR) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15951928. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 18-02870-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAR) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Moxe Health Corporation. (Clifford, John) (BAR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15951928 filed by Moxe Health Corporation. (Clifford, John) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(BAR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Moxe Health Corporation v. Health Moxy LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Health Moxy LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Moxe Health Corporation | |
Represented By: | Dana P Jozefczyk |
Represented By: | John Allen Clifford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.