Bradley v. Karth et al
Plaintiff: Kimberley Ann Bradley
Defendant: Unknown Parties, Betsy Tait and Brian D Karth
Case Number: 2:2018cv02890
Filed: September 13, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 *ORDER: The docket shall reflect that the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), that any appeal of this decision is not taken in good faith. The Clerk of Court must forward a copy of this Order to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 10/26/18. (EJA) *NEF regenerated on 10/26/2018 (CEI).
October 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REFERRAL NOTICE of USCA, pursuant to 28:1915, this matter is referred to the District Court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith, re: 18-17067, #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Kimberley Ann Bradley. (EJA)
October 25, 2018 Filing 11 USCA Case Number re: #10 Notice of Appeal. Case number 18-17067, Ninth Circuit. (EJA)
October 18, 2018 Filing 10 *NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals re: #8 Order, #9 Clerks Judgment by Kimberley Ann Bradley. (EJA) NOTE: Filed using the date the notice of appeal was received at the Ninth Circuit. *Modified text on 10/24/2018 (EJA).
September 14, 2018 Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's order filed September 14, 2018, Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed. (EJA)
September 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #3 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) Plaintiff's Complaint against all Defendants is dismissed, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. Plaintiff's Motion to Allow Electronic Filing (Doc. #2 ) is denied as moot. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 9/14/18. (EJA)
September 13, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAS)
September 13, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS)
September 13, 2018 Filing 5 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Judge G. Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-02890-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAS)
September 13, 2018 Filing 4 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Kimberley Ann Bradley. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (BAS)
September 13, 2018 Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kimberley Ann Bradley. (BAS)
September 13, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Kimberley Ann Bradley. (BAS)
September 13, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kimberley Ann Bradley.(BAS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bradley v. Karth et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberley Ann Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Betsy Tait
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian D Karth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?