Baker v. Maricopa County Superior Court et al
Petitioner: Harold Dee Baker
Respondent: Maricopa County Superior Court and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Case Number: 2:2018cv02893
Filed: September 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Deborah M Fine (PS)
Referring Judge: Bruce G Macdonald (PS)
2 Judge: Rosemary Marquez
3 Judge: Douglas L Rayes
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Amended Petition by Harold Dee Baker (2 pages). (DXD)
October 12, 2018 Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER: This case is reassigned to Judge Rosemary Marquez and referred to Magistrate Judge Bruce G Macdonald (PS). All future filings shall reflect the following case number: CV-18-2893-PHX-RM--BGM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SJF)
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER - Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend. Petitioner has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file an amended petition. The Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice of this action, without further notice to Petitioner, if Petitioner fails to submit an amended petition on the court-approved form within 30 days from the filing date of this Order and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 10/3/18. (LAD)
September 12, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (LAD)
September 12, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Harold Dee Baker. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Envelope)(LAD) (104 pages. Note: Document contains an extra page 2, the first page 2 is part of an application to proceed in forma pauperis but the rest of the application is not provided)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baker v. Maricopa County Superior Court et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Maricopa County Superior Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Harold Dee Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?