Maknissian v. Microchip Technology Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Shant Maknissian
Defendant: Ganesh Moorthy, James Eric Bjornholt, Stephen Sanghi and Microchip Technology Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2018cv02924
Filed: September 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2018 Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #14 , Civil Case Terminated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (JAMA)
November 13, 2018 Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Shant Maknissian. (Himelrick, Richard)
November 13, 2018 Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Keith E Eggleton on behalf of defendants. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
October 31, 2018 Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by James Eric Bjornholt, Microchip Technology Incorporated, Ganesh Moorthy, Stephen Sanghi identifying Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., Other Affiliate T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. for Microchip Technology Incorporated. (Rosenbaum, David)
October 26, 2018 Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Thomas W Elrod on behalf of plaintiff. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
October 18, 2018 Remark: Pro hac vice motions granted for Robert Prongay and Lionel Glancy on behalf of plaintiff. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
October 18, 2018 Remark: Pro hac vice motions granted for Lesley F Portnoy and Charles H Linehan on behalf of plaintiff. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
October 12, 2018 Filing 12 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Shant Maknissian: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 9/25/18 to Stephen Sanghi . (Himelrick, Richard)
October 12, 2018 Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Shant Maknissian: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 9/25/18 to Ganesh Moorthy . (Himelrick, Richard)
October 12, 2018 Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Shant Maknissian: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 9/25/18 to James Eric Bjornholt . (Himelrick, Richard)
October 12, 2018 Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Shant Maknissian: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 9/25/18 to Microchip Technology Inc. . (Himelrick, Richard)
October 4, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by David B Rosenbaum on behalf of James Eric Bjornholt, Microchip Technology Incorporated, Ganesh Moorthy, Stephen Sanghi. (Rosenbaum, David)
September 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 9/20/18. (JAMA)
September 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on December 18, 2018. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 9/20/18. (JAMA)
September 18, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC)
September 18, 2018 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to James Eric Bjornholt, Microchip Technology Incorporated, Ganesh Moorthy, Stephen Sanghi. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(BAC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
September 17, 2018 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15967805. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-02924-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAC)
September 17, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Shant Maknissian. (Himelrick, Richard) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(BAC)
September 17, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15967805 filed by Shant Maknissian. (Himelrick, Richard) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maknissian v. Microchip Technology Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ganesh Moorthy
Represented By: David B Rosenbaum
Represented By: Keith E Eggleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Eric Bjornholt
Represented By: David B Rosenbaum
Represented By: Keith E Eggleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen Sanghi
Represented By: David B Rosenbaum
Represented By: Keith E Eggleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Microchip Technology Incorporated
Represented By: David B Rosenbaum
Represented By: Keith E Eggleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shant Maknissian
Represented By: Lionel Zevi Glancy
Represented By: Robert V Prongay
Represented By: Lesley F Portnoy
Represented By: Charles H Linehan
Represented By: Richard Glenn Himelrick
Represented By: Thomas W Elrod
Represented By: Thomas Elrod
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?