P v. Winston
Kate P. and Kate P |
Jameis Winston |
2:2018cv02926 |
September 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
H Russel Holland |
Personal Injury: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER: Parties shall conduct a conference on or before December 10,2018, for purposes of jointly completing a Case Management Conference Report. On or before December 14, 2018, counsel for all parties shall jointly file their Case Management Conference Report with the court. The court will employ the parties' Case Management Conference Report for purposes of completing and issuing a Case Management Order. Once entered, the Case Management Order may be changed only for good cause shown and with the consent of the court. See document for further details. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 10/19/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (REK) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER FROM THE CHAMBERS OF H. RUSSEL HOLLAND: The court is in receipt of plaintiff's status report #8 , filed October 18, 2018. The time for defendant to respond to plaintiff's complaint is extended to November 27, 2018. (REK) |
Filing 8 STATUS REPORT by Kate P. (Clune, John) |
Filing 7 ORDER/NOTICE: Defendant has been served. The time for defendant to respond to the plaintiff's complaint has expired. Plaintiff will please call upon defendant to respond to the complaint forthwith, or apply to the clerk of the court for entry of default, or file a brief case status report on or before seven days from the entry of this order. Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 10/15/2018. (REK) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for John Clune on behalf of plaintiff. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Kate P: Affidavit of Service re: Summons and Complaint served upon Jameis Winston on September 21, 2018. (Powell, Sara) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAR) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Jameis Winston. (BAR). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-15968492. This case has been assigned to the Honorable H Russel Holland. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 18-02926-PHX-HRH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAR) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Kate P..(Powell, Sara) (BAR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-15968492 filed by Kate P.. (Powell, Sara) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.