Washington v. Banner University Medical Center et al
| Phillip Markquez Washington |
| Banner Health and Banner University Medical Center |
| 2:2018cv03002 |
| September 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Deborah M Fine |
| John J Tuchi |
| Personal Injury: Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. #2 ) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Plaintiff's Motion to Allow Electronic Filing (Doc. #10 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to close this case. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/12/18. (SLQ)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Phillip Markquez Washington. (SLQ) (5 pages). |
| Filing 9 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Phillip Markquez Washington. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (SLQ) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge John J. Tuchi. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-18-3002-PHX-JJT. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 7 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (SST) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (SST) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Deborah M Fine. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-03002-PHX-DMF. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form Instructions)(SST) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Phillip Markquez Washington. (SST) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Phillip Markquez Washington.(SST) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
