Pixler v. Arizona, State of et al
Plaintiff: Larissa T Pixler
Defendant: Daniel Bergin, Arizona, State of, Henry Darwin, Irene Stratton, Chuck Stratton, Maureen T Jackson, Tim Jackson and Douglas A Ducey
Case Number: 2:2018cv03036
Filed: September 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Steven P Logan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Case Management Conference is set for 1/11/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 501, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Steven P Logan. See order for additional deadlines and details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 11/7/2018. (LMR)
November 7, 2018 Filing 10 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint (First Amended) by Arizona, State of, Daniel Bergin, Henry Darwin, Douglas A Ducey, Maureen T Jackson, Tim Jackson, Chuck Stratton, Irene Stratton.(Ogden, Mark)
November 7, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Stanley Ray Foreman, Jr on behalf of Arizona, State of, Daniel Bergin, Henry Darwin, Douglas A Ducey, Maureen T Jackson, Tim Jackson, Chuck Stratton, Irene Stratton. (Foreman, Stanley)
October 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: The parties' Stipulation to Extend the Deadline for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint #7 is granted. Defendants' time to respond to the complaint is extended to 11/7/2018. No further extensions will be granted. See order for additional details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/30/2018. (LMR)
October 30, 2018 Filing 7 *STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Arizona, State of, Daniel Bergin, Henry Darwin, Maureen T Jackson, Tim Jackson, Chuck Stratton. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ogden, Mark) *Modified to correct filers on 10/31/2018 (REK).
October 26, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE re: Service of Preliminary Order by Larissa T Pixler re: #4 Order . (Enoch, Nicholas)
October 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff must show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed in its entirety for failure to prosecute no later than 11/7/2018, unless an answer is filed within such time. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order on Defendants. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/22/2018. (LMR)
October 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRELIMINARY ORDER: Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order and its Attachments on Defendant(s) and file notice of service with the Clerk of Court. In accordance with the MIDP General Order, Defendant(s) must file a responsive pleading (an answer, counterclaim, crossclaim, and/or reply) within the time set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, irrespective of whether Defendant (s) intend to file a preliminary motion. The parties must exchange MIDP Responses and file notice of service with the Clerk of Court no later than thirty (30) days after the first responsive pleading (an answer, counterclaim, crossclaim, and/or reply) is filed. Supplemental MIDP Responses shall be served on the opposing party no later than thirty (30) days after the information is discovered or revealed. The parties must produce to the opposing party the electronically stored information identified in the MIDP Responses no later than forty (40) days after the MIDP Responses have been served. The parties shall file with the Clerk of Court a notice of service of MIDP Responses, supplemental MIDP Responses, and production of ESI, rather than copies of the actual disclosures. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/04/2018. (REK)
September 26, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAC)
September 25, 2018 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16002023. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-03036-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached.(BAC)
September 25, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2018-007649. Filing fee received: $400.00, receipt number 0970-16002023 filed by Tim Jackson, Daniel Bergin, Maureen T Jackson, Arizona, State of, Henry Darwin, Chuck Stratton, Irene Stratton. (Ogden, Mark) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2)(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pixler v. Arizona, State of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Bergin
Represented By: Peter Christopher Prynkiewicz
Represented By: Mark Ogden
Represented By: Stanley Ray Foreman, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona, State of
Represented By: Peter Christopher Prynkiewicz
Represented By: Mark Ogden
Represented By: Stanley Ray Foreman, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Henry Darwin
Represented By: Peter Christopher Prynkiewicz
Represented By: Mark Ogden
Represented By: Stanley Ray Foreman, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Irene Stratton
Represented By: Peter Christopher Prynkiewicz
Represented By: Mark Ogden
Represented By: Stanley Ray Foreman, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chuck Stratton
Represented By: Peter Christopher Prynkiewicz
Represented By: Mark Ogden
Represented By: Stanley Ray Foreman, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maureen T Jackson
Represented By: Peter Christopher Prynkiewicz
Represented By: Mark Ogden
Represented By: Stanley Ray Foreman, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tim Jackson
Represented By: Peter Christopher Prynkiewicz
Represented By: Mark Ogden
Represented By: Stanley Ray Foreman, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Douglas A Ducey
Represented By: Mark Ogden
Represented By: Stanley Ray Foreman, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larissa T Pixler
Represented By: Kaitlyn Alissa Redfield-Ortiz
Represented By: Nicholas Jason Enoch
Represented By: Stanley Lubin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?