Lindeman et al v. Liberty Mutual Group et al
Plaintiff: Howard Lindsay and Deanna Lindeman
Defendant: Unknown Parties and Liberty Mutual Group
Case Number: 2:2018cv03147
Filed: October 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Eileen S Willett
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER re: #17 Notice of Settlement - IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file a Stipulation to Dismiss within 60 days of the filing of this Order. The Court will dismiss the case with prejudice on Tuesday, January 22, 2019 if a Stipulation to Dismiss or Joint Status Report is not filed within 60 days of the filing of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 11/16/18. (LAD)
November 15, 2018 Filing 17 NOTICE of Settlement by Liberty Mutual Group. (Stafford, Karen)
October 18, 2018 Filing 16 Minute Order: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
October 17, 2018 Filing 15 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
October 17, 2018 Filing 14 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
October 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting a one-time extension of time to respond to complaint by 30 days. The parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's answer to the complaint after the 30-day extension. The parties should be aware that the filing of a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) will not postpone the time for compliance with the MIDP. General Order 17-08 provides that compliance may be deferred only for motions to dismiss based on lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, sovereign immunity, or absolute or qualified immunity of a public official. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 10/15/18. (LAD)
October 11, 2018 Filing 10 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT Revised Stipulation by Liberty Mutual Group. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Meyer, Cassandra)
October 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying #7 Stipulation For Extension of Time To Answer Complaint without prejudice. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 10/11/18. (MSA)
October 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs serve a copy of this Order upon Defendants and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 10/11/18. (MSA)
October 10, 2018 Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Liberty Mutual Group. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stafford, Karen)
October 8, 2018 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Liberty Mutual Group. (Stafford, Karen)
October 4, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Liberty Mutual Group. (KEP)
October 4, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP)
October 3, 2018 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16036061. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Eileen S. Willett. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-3147-PHX-ESW. Magistrate Election form attached. PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (KEP)
October 3, 2018 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Liberty Mutual Group. (Meyer, Cassandra) (KEP)
October 3, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2018-092411. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16036061 filed by Liberty Mutual Group. (Meyer, Cassandra) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit Notice to Plaintiff)(KEP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lindeman et al v. Liberty Mutual Group et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Group
Represented By: Cassandra Victoria Meyer
Represented By: Karen Christine Stafford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Howard Lindsay
Represented By: Marlon E Branham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deanna Lindeman
Represented By: Marlon E Branham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?