Stuart-Davis v. PopHealthcare LLC
| Linda Stuart-Davis |
| PopHealthcare LLC |
| 2:2018cv03154 |
| October 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan R Bolton |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by PopHealthcare LLC. (Chasson, Jill) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to PopHealthcare LLC. (MAW) |
Filing 11
ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Case Management Conference is set for December 17, 2018, at 1:15 p.m. in Courtroom 502, Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Federal Courthouse, 401 W. Washington St., Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2151 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 11/13/18. (MAW)
|
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Kimberly S Veirs on behalf of defendant. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by PopHealthcare LLC.(Garrett, Tim) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Tim K Garrett on behalf of defendant. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Linda Stuart-Davis: Proof of Service re: Verified Complaint, Summons, Order, Notice of MIDP upon PopHealth Care/CT Corporation - Reg Agent on 10/16/2018. (Miller, Jessica) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 10/5/18. (CLB)
|
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to PopHealthcare LLC. (SST). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Submitted by Linda Stuart-Davis. (Miller, Jessica) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #2 Summons Submitted filed by Linda Stuart-Davis. Attorney information missing; summons must list attorney information on form where indicated. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile corrected document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MFR) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MFR) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16038318. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan R Bolton. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-03154-PHX-SRB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MFR) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Linda Stuart-Davis. (Miller, Jessica) (MFR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16038318 filed by Linda Stuart-Davis. (Miller, Jessica) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MFR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stuart-Davis v. PopHealthcare LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Linda Stuart-Davis | |
| Represented By: | Jessica Elizabeth Miller |
| Represented By: | Michael David Zoldan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PopHealthcare LLC | |
| Represented By: | Tim K Garrett |
| Represented By: | Jill Johnson Chasson |
| Represented By: | Kimberly S Veirs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
