Venieris v. PVH Retail Stores LLC
| Patrick Venieris |
| PVH Retail Stores LLC and PVH Retail Stores LLC an Arizona Limited Liability Company doing business as Tommy Hilfiger Company Store doing business as Tommy Hilfiger |
| 2:2018cv03161 |
| October 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Steven P Logan |
| Eileen S Willett |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Rule 16 Case Management Conference is set for 1/11/2019 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 501, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Steven P Logan. See order for additional deadlines and details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 11/20/2018. (LMR)
|
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Lary Alan Rappaport on behalf of defendant. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER to #16 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by PVH Retail Stores LLC.(Grabel, Joshua) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Lawrence I Weinstein on behalf of defendant. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Jeffrey H Warshafsky on behalf of defendants. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Patrick Venieris.(McKay, Michael) |
| Filing 15 *NOTICE re: Service of #14 Order by Patrick Venieris . (McKay, Michael) *Modified to add document link on 10/23/2018 (REK). |
|
Filing 14
PRELIMINARY ORDER: Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order and its Attachments on Defendant(s) and file notice of service with the Clerk of Court. Defendant(s) must file a responsive pleading (an answer, counterclaim, crossclaim, and/or reply) within the time set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, irrespective of whether Defendant (s) intend to file a preliminary motion. The parties must exchange MIDP Responses and file notice of service with the Clerk of Court no later than thirty (30) days after the first responsive pleading (an answer, counterclaim, crossclaim, and/or reply) is filed. Supplemental MIDP Responses shall be served on the opposing party no later than thirty (30) days after the information is discovered or revealed. The parties must produce to the opposing party the electronically stored information identified in the MIDP Responses no later than forty (40) days after the MIDP Responses have been served. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the parties shall file with the Clerk of Court a notice of service of MIDP Responses, supplemental MIDP Responses, and production of ESI, rather than copies of the actual disclosures. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/19/2018. (REK)
|
| Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Steven P. Logan. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-18-3161-PHX-SPL. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 12 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: The Motion for Reconsideration #9 is granted. The parties in this case have requested an extension of Defendant's time to answer the complaint. The Court concludes that the parties have shown good cause, and will grant a one-time extension for Defendant to respond to the complaint. Because the effectiveness of the MIDP depends in part on early disclosures, the Court will not grant additional extensions. Thus, the parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's response to the complaint after the extension. The parties should be aware that the filing of a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) will not postpone the time for compliance with the MIDP. The General Order provides that compliance may be deferred only for motions to dismiss based on lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, sovereign immunity, or absolute or qualified immunity of a public official. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting an extension of time for Defendant PVH Retail Stores LLC to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint to November 2, 2018. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 10/15/2018. (REK)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Reconsideration re: #7 Order on Stipulation (Unopposed) by PVH Retail Stores LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Grabel, Joshua) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 10/11/2018. (REK)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: The Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint #6 is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 10/11/2018. (REK)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by PVH Retail Stores LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Grabel, Joshua) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KEP) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16040518. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Eileen S. Willett. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-03161-PHX-ESW. Magistrate Election form attached. PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (KEP) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by PVH Retail Stores LLC. (Grabel, Joshua) (KEP) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2018-005427. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16040518 filed by PVH Retail Stores LLC. (Grabel, Joshua) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4)(KEP) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED: Declaration of Service re: Summons, Class Action Complaint and Certificate Regarding Compulsory Arbitration upon Defendant Stat Agent: Corporation Service Company on 9/18/2018. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 9/18/2018) (KEP) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
