Mitchell v. Ryan, et al.
Petitioner: Kevin Norris Mitchell
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Case Number: 2:2018cv03165
Filed: October 4, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Eileen S Willett (PS)
Referring Judge: Steven P Logan
2 Judge: Eileen S Willett
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Respondents shall file their answer or other responsive pleading to Petitioner's #1 Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus no later than January 4, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 11/28/18 (MSA)
November 27, 2018 Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer /MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS/ by Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order order)(Thorson, Amy)
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER - The Court has directed the Clerk of Court to serve a copy of the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on Respondents. The Court ordered Respondents to answer the Petition within forty days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within thirty days from the date the Answer is served. See document for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 11/26/18. (MSA)
November 1, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy M Thorson on behalf of Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan. (Thorson, Amy)
October 29, 2018 Filing 7 Notice of Receipt of Electronic Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Arizona Attorney General on 10/26/18. The Attorney General's Office will file a Notice of Appearance within five (5) business days that identifies the respondents that are represented or, in the alternative, will notify the Court if the Attorney General is not able to accept service for and/or represent any of the named respondents. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (Sparks, Jeffrey)
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254) - Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. #1 ) and this Order on the Respondent(s) and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by electronic mail pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, and the Memorandum of Understanding between the United States District Clerk of Court for the District of Arizona and the Arizona Attorney General's Office. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/22/18. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (LAD)
October 19, 2018 Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER: The Minute Order issued on 10/12/18 that reassigned this case was issued in error. The previous assignment of this case to Judge Steven P Logan and the referral of this case to Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett (PS) is AFFIRMED. All future filings shall reflect the following case number: CV-18-3165-SPL--ESW. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SJF)
October 12, 2018 Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER: This case is reassigned to Judge Rosemary Marquez and referred to Magistrate Judge Lynnette C Kimmins (PS). All future filings shall reflect the following case number: CV-18-3165-PHX-RM (LCK). All deadlines and hearings are AFFIRMED unless reset by separate order. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
October 4, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (LAD)
October 4, 2018 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kevin Norris Mitchell. (LAD) (2 pages)
October 4, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Kevin Norris Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (LAD) (19 pages)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell v. Ryan, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Represented By: Amy M Thorson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Charles L Ryan
Represented By: Amy M Thorson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kevin Norris Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?