Miller #116524 v. Ryan et al
| William Earl Miller, Jr. |
| Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan |
| 2:2018cv03176 |
| October 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Bridget S Bade (PS) |
| Steven P Logan |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: Respondents' Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #10 is granted. Respondents shall file a response to the Petition by January 14, 2019. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 11/26/2018. (REK)
|
| Filing 10 *First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) by Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Francis, Jillian) *Modified to add additional filer on 11/26/2018 (REK). |
| Filing 9 *NOTICE of Appearance by Jillian Brittany Francis on behalf of Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona. (Francis, Jillian) *Modified to add additional filer on 10/26/2018 (REK). |
| Filing 8 Notice of Receipt of Electronic Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Arizona Attorney General on 10/19/18. The Attorney General's Office will file a Notice of Appearance within five (5) business days that identifies the respondents that are represented or, in the alternative, will notify the Court if the Attorney General is not able to accept service for and/or represent any of the named respondents. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (Sparks, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: The Minute Order issued on 10/12/18 that reassigned this case was issued in error. The previous assignment of this case to Judge Steven P Logan and the referral of this case to Magistrate Judge Bridget S Bade (PS) is AFFIRMED. All future filings shall reflect the following case number: CV-18-3176-PHX-SPL--BSB. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SJF) |
|
Filing 6
Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254): Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is granted. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Eric J. Markovich for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. (see Order for complete details) Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 10/17/2018. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254))(SIB)
|
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER: This case is reassigned to Judge Jennifer G Zipps and referred to Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich (PS). All future filings shall reflect the following case number: CV-18-3176-PHX-JGZ--EJM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SJF) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (REK) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (REK) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by William Earl Miller, Jr. (2 pages) (REK) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by William Earl Miller, Jr. (102 pages) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
