Kopta v. Ken Ellegard - Peoria Incorporated
| William Kopta |
| Ken Ellegard, Ken Ellegard - Peoria Incorporated and Ken Ellegard - Peoria Incorporated doing business as Arrowhead Honda |
| 2:2018cv03203 |
| October 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| H Russel Holland |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER - All parties shall conduct a conference on or before November 30,2018, for purposes of jointly completing a Case Management Conference Report. On or before December 7, 2018, counsel for all parties shall jointly file their Case Management Conference Report with the court.Signed by Judge H Russel Holland on 11/16/2018. (Attachments: #1 Example)(KAS)
|
| Filing 10 *Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ken Ellegard - Peoria Incorporated . (Mullis, Jodi) *Modified do remove corporate affiliate on 11/9/2018 (KAS). |
| Filing 9 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Ken Ellegard - Peoria Incorporated. (Mullis, Jodi) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Ken Ellegard - Peoria Incorporated.(Mullis, Jodi) |
| Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by William Kopta: Proof of Service re: complaint summons order upon Ken Ellegard - Peoria Inc. on 10/19/2018. (Tate, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: [1-1] Civil Cover Sheet filed by William Kopta. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(c) - Documents shall be converted to PDF directly from a word processing program and per Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual must be text searchable. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KEP) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ken Ellegard. (KEP). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16048211. This case has been assigned to the Honorable H. Russell Holland. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-3203-PHX-HRH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KEP) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by William Kopta. (Tate, Elizabeth) (KEP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16048211 filed by William Kopta. (Tate, Elizabeth) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(KEP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
