James v. American Family Insurance
Joseph James, Jr. |
American Family Mutual Insurance Company SI, American Standard Insurance Company, American Family Financial Services, American Security Insurance Company, Unknown Parties, American Family Insurance, American Family Mutual Insurance Company and American Family Life Insurance Company |
2:2018cv03391 |
October 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Douglas L Rayes |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant American Family Mutual Insurance Company SI. (Ronan, Kristyn) |
Filing 7 ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: A Scheduling Conference is set for 1/24/2019 at 04:30 PM in Courtroom 605, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Douglas L Rayes. (See Order for details) Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 10/22/18. (CLB) |
Filing 6 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 10/22/18. (CLB) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAR) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAR) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16099153. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 18-03391-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAR) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by American Family Mutual Insurance Company SI. (Ronan, Kristyn) (BAR) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2018-008963. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16099153 filed by American Family Mutual Insurance Company SI. (Ronan, Kristyn) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit 6)(BAR) |
***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED: ANSWER to Complaint by American Family Mutual Insurance Company SI. ENTERED IN DISTRICT COURT FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PURPOSES***(BAR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.