Butler v. Pinal County Grand Jury et al
| Charles T Butler |
| Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Pinal County Grand Jury |
| 2:2018cv03417 |
| October 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Deborah M Fine (PS) |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's Order filed October 30, 2018, Petitioners Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U. S. C. 2254 is dismissed. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. (DXD) |
Filing 3
ORDER - The Petition (Doc. #1 ) and this action are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 10/29/18. (DXD)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (EJA) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Charles T Butler. (9 pages) (Attachments: #1 envelope)(EJA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
