Coslett v. Hannart et al
| Gabriel James Coslett |
| Rasier LLC, Unknown Parties, Uber Technologies Incorporated, Unknown Hannart and Yuric Alexander Hannart |
| 2:2018cv03462 |
| October 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Steven P Logan |
| Personal Injury: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION Motion to Reinstate Hannart Defendants by Gabriel James Coslett. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Motion for Relief from Stay, #2 Exhibit B, Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C, Order granting Relief from Stay, #4 Exhibit D, Motion to Reinstate Hannart Defendants filed in state court, #5 Exhibit E, Minute Entry re no action taken in state court on Motion to Reinstate, #6 Text of Proposed Order Order, proposed)(Preston, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #11 Notice of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (DXD) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) on Defendants filed by Plaintiff Gabriel James Coslett. (Preston, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendants Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies Incorporated. (Bhatt, Sitar) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies Incorporated identifying Corporate Parent Rasier LLC for Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies Incorporated. (Bhatt, Sitar) |
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Case Management Conference is set for 1/11/2019 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 501, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Steven P Logan. See order for additional deadlines and details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 11/1/2018. (LMR)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies Incorporated.(Bhatt, Sitar) |
|
Filing 6
PRELIMINARY ORDER: Plaintiff(s) must file proof of service of the summons and complaint or of waiver of service with the Clerk of Court no later than January 23, 2019. Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order and its Attachments on Defendant(s) and file notice of service with the Clerk of Court. Unless the Court orders otherwise, on January 23, 2019, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant(s) must file a responsive pleading (an answer, counterclaim, crossclaim, and/or reply) within the time set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, irrespective of whether Defendant (s) intend to file a preliminary motion. The parties must exchange MIDP Responses and file notice of service with the Clerk of Court no later than thirty (30) days after the first responsive pleading (an answer, counterclaim, crossclaim, and/or reply) is filed.Supplemental MIDP Responses shall be served on the opposing party no later than thirty (30) days after the information is discovered or revealed. The parties must produce to the opposing party the electronically stored information identified in the MIDP Responses no later than forty (40) days after the MIDP Responses have been served. The parties shall file with the Clerk of Court a notice of service of MIDP Responses, supplemental MIDP Responses, and production of ESI, rather than copies of the actual disclosures. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/25/2018. (REK)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Rasier LLC. (MCO) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MCO) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16116375. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-03462-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2018-005515. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16116375 filed by Uber Technologies Incorporated, Rasier LLC. (Bhatt, Sitar) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(MCO) |
| Filing 1 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Uber Technologies Incorporated identifying Corporate Parent Rasier LLC for Uber Technologies Incorporated. (Bhatt, Sitar) (MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
