Neda v. Unknown Party
Plaintiff: Augustine G Neda
Defendant: Unknown Party
Case Number: 2:2018cv03550
Filed: October 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: James F Metcalf (PS)
Referring Judge: John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION to Correct Case by Augustine G Neda. (2 pages) (EJA)
October 29, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Venue Change or Release by Augustine G Neda. (1 page) (EJA)
October 25, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (EJA)
October 25, 2018 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Augustine G Neda. (9 pages) (Attachments: #1 envelope)(EJA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neda v. Unknown Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Augustine G Neda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?