O.P.E.N. America Incorporated v. Ruth LLC et al
Petitioner: O.P.E.N. America Incorporated and O.P.E.N. America Incorporated doing business as OpenWorks
Respondent: Ruth Mark and Ruth LLC
Case Number: 2:2018cv03780
Filed: November 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2018 Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #10 Service Executed filed by O.P.E.N. America Incorporated. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (EJA)
December 7, 2018 Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by O.P.E.N. America Incorporated: Acceptance of Service re: Petition to Compel Arbitration upon Ruth LLC and Ruth Mark on December 6, 2018. (Thorpe, William)
November 8, 2018 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Ruth Mark, Ruth LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
November 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDARD CIVIL TRACK INITIALORDER: If not already accomplished prior to the date of this Order, that Plaintiff(s) shall effect service of the Complaint and Summons upon all Defendants no later than 90 days after the filing of the Complaint. ORDERED that the parties must comply with Gen. Ord. No. 17-08 (D. Ariz. Apr. 14, 2017) regarding the mandatory initial discovery responses. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve Defendant(s) with a copy of this Order. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 11/7/18. (EJA)
November 7, 2018 Filing 7 SUMMONS Submitted by O.P.E.N. America Incorporated. (Thorpe, William)
November 7, 2018 Filing 6 SUMMONS Submitted by O.P.E.N. America Incorporated. (Thorpe, William)
November 5, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by O.P.E.N. America Incorporated. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAR)
November 5, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAR)
November 5, 2018 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16160417. This case has been assigned to the Honorable James A Teilborg. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 18-03780-PHX-JAT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAR)
November 5, 2018 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by O.P.E.N. America Incorporated. (Thorpe, William) (BAR)
November 5, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16160417 filed by O.P.E.N. America Incorporated. (Thorpe, William) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(BAR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O.P.E.N. America Incorporated v. Ruth LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ruth Mark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ruth LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: O.P.E.N. America Incorporated
Represented By: Kristin Ann Paiva
Represented By: Nicole Marie Stewart
Represented By: William Lee Thorpe
Represented By: Andre Harbon Merrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: O.P.E.N. America Incorporated doing business as OpenWorks
Represented By: Kristin Ann Paiva
Represented By: Nicole Marie Stewart
Represented By: William Lee Thorpe
Represented By: Andre Harbon Merrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?