Rohrer v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Darren Kent Rohrer |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 2:2018cv03981 |
| November 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| G Murray Snow |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Darren Kent Rohrer: Return of Service re: Summons, Complaint and Scheduling Order upon U.S. Attorney's Office on 12/10/2018, Office of Regional Counsel on 12/10/2018, Attorney General on 12/10/2018. (DelGuercio, Melissa) |
Filing 8
SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties must fully comply with the following deadlines and procedures (See document for further details). Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 11/14/2018. (REK)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on February 7, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 11/14/2018. (REK)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration (via Office of Regional Chief Counsel), U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(REK) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: The application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, without prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security #2 is granted. Plaintiff shall be responsible for service by waiver or of the summons and complaint. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 11/14/2018. (REK)
|
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Melissa DelGuercio on behalf of plaintiff. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-3981-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MFR) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Darren Kent Rohrer. (DelGuercio, Melissa) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(MFR) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Darren Kent Rohrer. (DelGuercio, Melissa) (MFR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Darren Kent Rohrer. (DelGuercio, Melissa) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Letter)(MFR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rohrer v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Darren Kent Rohrer | |
| Represented By: | Melissa A DelGuercio |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
