Payne v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
| Claudie Payne |
| C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated |
| 2:2018cv04037 |
| November 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| David G Campbell |
| Personal Injury: Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by David W Bauman on behalf of Claudie Payne. (Bauman, David) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G. Campbell, with member case number: CV-18-4037-PHX-DGC. This case is included in MDL-2641. All future pleadings or documents should be filed in the Lead Case: 2:15-md-2641-DGC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Claudie Payne. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16187309 filed by Claudie Payne. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
