Corrales et al v. Badger Productions LLC et al
| Ardelis Vargas and Viridiana Corrales |
| Sean Badger, Badger Productions LLC and Badger Productions LLC an Arizona company doing business as Monarch Club Solistic |
| 2:2018cv04168 |
| November 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John J Tuchi |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Viridiana Corrales, Ardelis Vargas: Proof of Service re: SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION, VERIFIED COMPLAINT, NOTICE TO PARTIES, GENERAL ORDER, MANDATORY INITIAL DISCOVERY, ORDER upon Sean Badger on 19.01.10. (Barrat, Jason) |
| Filing 8 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Viridiana Corrales, Ardelis Vargas: Proof of Service re: SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION, VERIFIED COMPLAINT, NOTICE TO PARTIES, GENERAL ORDER, MANDATORY INITIAL DISCOVERY, ORDER upon Badger Productions, LLC on 19.01.04. (Barrat, Jason) |
Filing 7
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on February 20, 2019. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 11/26/18. (JAMA)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 11/26/18. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Sean Badger, Badger Productions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(KEP). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16220569. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J. Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-4168-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KEP) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Viridiana Corrales, Ardelis Vargas. (Barrat, Jason) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(KEP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16220569 filed by Viridiana Corrales, Ardelis Vargas. (Barrat, Jason) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(KEP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
