Glen Orange Mart et al v. United States of America
| Munish Gupta, Aradhna Gupta and Glen Orange Mart |
| United States of America |
| 2:2018cv04176 |
| November 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Stephen M McNamee |
| G Murray Snow |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 07 U.S.C. ยง 601 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Stay Due to Federal Government Shutdown by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hemann, Lisa) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: This case is reassigned to Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee. All future filings shall reflect the following case number: CV-18-4176-PHX-SMM. Any pending deadlines and/or hearings are AFFIRMED unless reset by separate order. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SJF) |
Filing 8
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not be served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on February 20, 2019. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 11/26/2018. (REK)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Aradhna Gupta, Munish Gupta, Glen Orange Mart. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAR) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAR) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(BAR). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16222411. This case has been assigned to the Honorable G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 18-4176-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAR) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Glen Orange Mart, Aradhna Gupta, Munish Gupta. (Tapp, Andrew) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(BAR) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Glen Orange Mart. (Tapp, Andrew) (BAR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16222411 filed by Glen Orange Mart, Aradhna Gupta, Munish Gupta. (Tapp, Andrew) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(BAR) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Andrew Tapp on behalf of plaintiffs. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
