Slade v. JetPro International LLC et al
| Caroline Slade |
| James F Wine, JetPro Egypt LLC, Jeffrey Tyler Wine, James F Wine Revocable Trust, Unknown Wine, Kyle Jordan Wine, JetPro International LLC and Tracy D Weaver |
| 2:2018cv04186 |
| November 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John Z Boyle |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SLQ) |
Filing 8
Order that Caroline Slade show cause for failure to comply with LRCiv 3.7(b) before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. Show Cause Hearing set for 1/22/2019 at 04:30 PM before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. (Attachments: #1 Instructions, #2 Consent Form)(MAP)
|
| Filing 7 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Complaint, 6 Notice of Deficiency (Text Only) by Plaintiff Caroline Slade. (Pruitt, Michael) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Caroline Slade. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile with correct PDF document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KEP) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (KEP) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to James F Wine Revocable Trust, JetPro Egypt LLC, JetPro International LLC, Tracy D Weaver, James F Wine, Jeffrey Tyler Wine, Kyle Jordan Wine, Unknown Wine. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(KEP). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16226017. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John Z. Boyle. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-4186-PHX-JZB. Magistrate Election form attached. (KEP) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Caroline Slade. (Pruitt, Michael) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(KEP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16226017 filed by Caroline Slade. (Pruitt, Michael) (KEP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
