Tapestry on Central Condominium Association v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters Incorporated
Tapestry on Central Condominium Association |
Liberty Insurance Underwriters Incorporated |
2:2018cv04857 |
December 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
John J Tuchi |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Rule 26(f) Report for Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) Joint Proposed Case Management Plan filed by Plaintiff Tapestry on Central Condominium Association. (LaVoy, Christopher) |
|
Filing 14 *MOTION/REQUEST for Leave to Appear Telephonically at Scheduling Conference by Defendant Liberty Insurance Underwriters Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Richter, Jasmina) *Modified to correct event on 2/4/2019 (REK). |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Tapestry on Central Condominium Association. (LaVoy, Christopher) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Plaintiff Tapestry on Central Condominium Association. (LaVoy, Christopher) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Service of Responses to Mandatory Initial Discovery (MIDP) filed by Defendant Liberty Insurance Underwriters Incorporated. (Richter, Jasmina) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion granted for Sabrina Haurin on behalf of defendant. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
|
|
Filing 8 PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Tapestry on Central Condominium Association. (LaVoy, Christopher) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tapestry on Central Condominium Association. (LaVoy, Christopher) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #2 Notice of Removal by Liberty Insurance Underwriters Incorporated.(Richter, Jasmina) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Tapestry on Central Condominium Association. (MCO) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MCO) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16337600. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-04857-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2018-011944. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16337600 filed by Liberty Insurance Underwriters Incorporated. (Richter, Jasmina) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(MCO) |
Filing 1 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Liberty Insurance Underwriters Incorporated identifying Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Holdings Incorporated for Liberty Insurance Underwriters Incorporated. (Richter, Jasmina)(MCO) |
***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED : Certificate of Service re: Summons/Complaint/Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Arizona Director of Insurance, Statutory Agent, by serving Rosalie Osorio, Administration Assistant, authorized to receive and accept service of process in the State of Arizona by Arizona Department of Insurance on 11/30/2018. (MCO) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tapestry on Central Condominium Association v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters Incorporated | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Liberty Insurance Underwriters Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Sabrina Haurin |
Represented By: | Jasmina Richter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tapestry on Central Condominium Association | |
Represented By: | Christopher Alan LaVoy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.