Robinson v. Hacker-Agnew et al
Petitioner: James Robinson
Respondent: Carla Hacker-Agnew and Mark Brnovich
Case Number: 2:2018cv04945
Filed: December 28, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Deborah M Fine (PS)
Referring Judge: Deborah M Fine
2 Judge: Roslyn O Silver
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2019 Filing 7 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) by Carla Hacker-Agnew. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B, #2 Exhibit C, #3 Exhibit D-K)(Reilly, Andrew)
January 15, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Stuart Reilly on behalf of Carla Hacker-Agnew. (Reilly, Andrew)
January 11, 2019 Filing 5 Notice of Receipt of Electronic Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Arizona Attorney General on 01/11/19. The Attorney General's Office will file a Notice of Appearance within five (5) business days that identifies the respondents that are represented or, in the alternative, will notify the Court if the Attorney General is not able to accept service for and/or represent any of the named respondents. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (Sparks, Jeffrey)
January 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254) - Petitioner's #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the #1 Petition and this Order on the Respondents and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by electronic mail pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 1/10/19. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Exhibit)(MSA)
December 28, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT: (REK)
December 28, 2018 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by James Robinson. (2 pages) (REK)
December 28, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by James Robinson. (53 pages and envelope) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. Hacker-Agnew et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Carla Hacker-Agnew
Represented By: Andrew Stuart Reilly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mark Brnovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?