Sanders v. US Foods Incorporated
| Samantha Sanders |
| U.S. Foods Incorporated and US Foods Incorporated |
| 2:2018cv04946 |
| December 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan R Bolton |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. #10 ), Civil Case Terminated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAW) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Samantha Sanders. (Bendau, Clifford) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting a one-time extension of time until February 11, 2019 to respond to complaint. The parties' obligations to produce the information called for in the MIDP will be triggered by Defendant's answer to the complaint after the extension. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 2/4/19. (MAW)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Samantha Sanders. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Bendau, Clifford) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: After review of the docket, the Court notes that service on Defendant was made on January 7, 2019. No answer has been filed and no application for entry of default has been made. IT IS ORDERED that counsel for the Plaintiff file a status report within 7 days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter will be dismissed without further notice 7 days from the date of this Order if counsel fails to file a status report. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 1/30/19. (MAW)
|
| Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Samantha Sanders: Declaration of Service re: Complaint and Summons upon U.S. Foods Incorporated on 1/7/19. (Bendau, Clifford) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to U.S. Foods Incorporated. (MFR). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (MFR) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16354990. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan R Bolton. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-18-4946-PHX-SRB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MFR) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Samantha Sanders. (Bendau, Christopher) (MFR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16354990 filed by Samantha Sanders. (Bendau, Christopher) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MFR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
