Christian Relief Services Charities Incorporated v. Silktree Investments LLC et al
| Christian Relief Services Charities Incorporated |
| Silk Tree I LLC and Silktree Investments LLC |
| 2:2018cv04958 |
| December 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Dominic W Lanza |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT - IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff's #10 motion to remand and remanding this case back to the Maricopa County Superior Court. The Court will retain jurisdiction following remand to resolve the award of attorneys fees and costs. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 2/25/19. (Attachments: #1 Remand Letter)(MSA)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED granting the parties' Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #20 ). In the event that the Court denies Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, the parties shall have up to 20 days thereafter in which to file their Joint Case Management Report. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED vacating the case management conference on February 25, 2019. Ordered by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 2/19/19. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAW)
|
| Filing 20 First MOTION for Extension of Time To File Joint Case Management Report Stipulated by Christian Relief Services Charities Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order proposed order)(Valletta, James) |
| Filing 19 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Christian Relief Services Charities Incorporated. (Valletta, James) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED granting #17 the parties' Stipulation for Extension of Time for Reply in Support of Motion to Remand and extending the deadline for Plaintiff to file its Reply to February 15, 2019. Ordered by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 2/12/19. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 17 *STIPULATION for Extension of Time for Reply in Support of Motion to Remand by Christian Relief Services Charities Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Valletta, James) *Modified to correct event type on 2/12/2019 (EJA). |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion re: #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Silk Tree I LLC, Silktree Investments LLC. (Frerichs, Scott) |
| Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Christian Relief Services Charities Incorporated. (Valletta, James) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER: On January 2, 2019, a deficiency notice was sent to counsel for Plaintiff (Doc. #6 ) advising that counsel has failed to file the Corporate Disclosure Statement required by F.R.Civ.P.7.1 and LRCiv. 7.1.1. Counsel was given 14 days to file the Corporate Disclosure Statement. Counsel for Plaintiff has failed to respond to the deficiency notice and file the required Corporate Disclosure Statement. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff file its Corporate Disclosure Statement not later than 10 business days from the date of this Order [see attached order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 1/31/19. (MAW)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED granting the parties' Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Remand (Doc. #12 ) and extending to February 4, 2019 the deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Ordered by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 1/28/19. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAW)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Remand by Silk Tree I LLC, Silktree Investments LLC. (Frerichs, Scott) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Christian Relief Services Charities Incorporated. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MSA) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Christian Relief Services Charities Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Radius PSA, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order to Remand)(Valletta, James) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Case Management Conference is set for February 25, 2019, at 11:00 a.m., in Courtroom 601, Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Federal Courthouse, 401 W. Washington St., Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2151 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 1/8/19. (MAW)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Silk Tree I LLC, Silktree Investments LLC.(Frerichs, Scott) |
|
Filing 7
PRELIMINARY ORDER [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 1/8/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice - MIDP, #2 MIDP User Manual)(MAW)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Christian Relief Services Charities Incorporated. (BAR) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAR) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED: Affidavit of Service re: Summons, Certificate, Complaint upon Silk Tree I LLC and Silktree Investments LLC on December 10, 2018. (Originals filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on December 12, 2018 and December 11, 2018) (BAR) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
| Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16357793. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 18-04958-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAR) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Silk Tree I LLC. (Frerichs, Scott) (BAR) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Silktree Investments LLC. (Frerichs, Scott) (BAR) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV 2018-015022. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16357793 filed by Silk Tree I LLC, Silktree Investments LLC. (Frerichs, Scott) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(BAR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
