Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Incorporated
Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant: G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2018mc00045
Filed: August 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Douglas L Rayes
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2018 Miscellaneous case, MC-18-00045-PHX-DLR, converted to civil case, CV-18-03135-PHX-DLR, hearing held. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (LAD)
August 31, 2018 Filing 5 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: Certificate of Service re: Application for Order to Show Cause and Amended Order upon Linda Tran, wife and co resident of Phoung Ho on 8/28/2018. (Campbell, Nedra)
August 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 AMENDED ORDER that Phuong "Phil" Ho appear before this Court on 10/3/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 506, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003, and show cause, if any, why an order should not be entered holding him in contempt of court for failing and refusing to appear for his deposition scheduled on 6/27/2018. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 8/23/2018. (MMO)
August 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 *AMENDED by Doc. #4 * ORDER that Phuong Phil Ho appear before this Court on 10/3/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 506, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003, and show cause, if any, why an order should not be entered holding him in contempt of court for failing and refusing to appear for his deposition scheduled on 6/27/2018. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 8/22/2018. (MMO) Modified on 8/23/2018 (MMO).
August 17, 2018 Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes for ruling on Motion to Compel Compliance and Application For An Order To Show Cause Why Phuong "Phil" Ho Should Not Be Held In Contempt Of Court For Failing To Appear At Deposition. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: MC-18-00045-PHX-DLR. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KAH)
August 17, 2018 Filing 1 Miscellaneous Case Opening Regarding: Motion to Compel Compliance and Application For An Order To Show Cause Why Phuong "Phil" Ho Should Not Be Held In Contempt Of Court For Failing To Appear At Deposition filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(KAH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Represented By: Nedra Campbell
Represented By: Kenneth Lee Bird
Represented By: Omar Weaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?