Petramala v. Scottsdale, City of
| Michael Petramala |
| Scottsdale, City of |
| 2:2019cv00063 |
| January 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Steven P Logan |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to the Court's Order filed April 23, 2020, which granted the Motion to Dismiss, judgment is entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed with prejudice. (LAD) |
Filing 22
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #18 ) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action shall be dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this action. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 4/22/2020. (LAD)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER: The parties shall have until February 5, 2020 to submit any supporting documents for their respective positions regarding the pending Motion to Dismiss. After the deadline, the Court will issue a ruling pursuant to Rule 56 in due course. See order for additional details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 1/22/2020. (LMR)
|
| Filing 20 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #18 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Scottsdale, City of. (Davis, Lori) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion re: #18 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Michael Petramala. (EJA) |
| Filing 18 * MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Scottsdale, City of. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 6 - 7)(Davis, Lori) * Modified to correct event; attorney noticed on 9/17/2019 (LAD). |
| Filing 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Scottsdale, City of filed by Michael Petramala. (7 pages)(RMV) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #13 Amended Motion to Dismiss.Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff has until September 6, 2019 to file an amended complaint. Defendant has three weeks from the date Plaintiff files an amended complaint to file a responsive pleading. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 8/16/19. (MSA)
|
| Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Amended filed by Scottsdale, City of. (Davis, Lori) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Amended filed by Michael Petramala. (LAD) (2 pages) |
| Filing 13 * AMENDED MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Scottsdale, City of. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-5)(Davis, Lori) * Modified to correct event; attorney noticed on 3/13/2019 (LAD). |
|
Filing 12
ORDER denying #10 Motion to Allow Electronic Filing. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 2/11/2019. (LMR)
|
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Scottsdale, City of. (Davis, Lori) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Michael Petramala. (SLQ) (Same document as #9 ). |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Michael Petramala. (SLQ) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until February 21, 2019 to file a response to the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #6 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall file any reply within fifteen (15) days from the date Plaintiff's response is filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion shall be deemed ready for decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise ordered by the Court. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 1/22/19. (SLQ)
|
| Filing 7 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Michael Petramala. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (SLQ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Scottsdale, City of. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-3)(Davis, Lori) |
|
Filing 5
PRELIMINARY ORDER - Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order and its Attachments on Defendant(s) and file notice of service with the Clerk of Court. Parties must exchange MIDP Responses and file notice of service with the Clerk of Court no later than thirty (30) days after the first responsive pleading (an answer, counterclaim, crossclaim, and/or reply) is filed. Supplemental MIDP Responses shall be served on the opposing party no later than thirty (30) days after the information is discovered or revealed. Parties must produce to the opposing party the electronically stored information identified in the MIDP Responses no later than forty (40) days after the MIDP Responses have been served. Parties shall file with the Clerk of Court a notice of service of MIDP Responses, supplemental MIDP Responses, and production of ESI, rather than copies of the actual disclosures. (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 1/11/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Parties)(SLQ)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAR) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES - The Court is participating in the Mandatory Initial Discovery Pilot (MIDP) and this case is subject to that pilot. The key features and deadlines are set forth in the attached Notice which includes General Order 17-08. Also attached is a checklist for use by the parties. All parties must respond to the mandatory initial discovery requests set forth in the General Order before initiating any further discovery in this case. Please note: The discovery obligations in the General Order supersede the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1). Any party seeking affirmative relief must serve a copy of the attached documents (Notice to Parties, including General Order 17-08 and MIDP Checklist) on each new party when the Complaint, Counterclaim, Crossclaim, or Third-Party Complaint is served. (BAR) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 0970-16374032. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 19-00063-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAR) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2018-012446. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16374032 filed by Scottsdale, City of. (Davis, Lori) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(BAR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Petramala v. Scottsdale, City of | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Scottsdale, City of | |
| Represented By: | Lori Simpson Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Petramala | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
